How N207 billion was spent in Nigeria on 68 million people who didn’t vote

How N207 billion was spent in Nigeria on 68 million people who didn't vote

Although 68 million Nigerians registered to vote in the 2023 elections, a total of N207 billion was spent on them, many of them were unable to fulfill their civic duty for a variety of reasons.

The powerlessness to cast a ballot has been accused on supposed trashiness with respect to the Free Public Discretionary Commission (INEC) whose authorities showed up later than expected for surveys initiation and couldn’t go to the greater part of the potential electors who had raged surveying units the country over before the political race shut, movement from Nigeria and passing among others.

In the interim, a source at INEC has exonerated the Commission’s Executive, Teacher Mahmood Yakubu, of fault on a portion of the issues that went to the surveys, saying the constituent administration body’s (EMB) manager did all he could to convey Nigeria’s freest and most attractive political decision yet some “human elements” halted him.
Unexpected flaws in the technology used and the activities of what he referred to as partisan Resident Electoral Commissioners (RECs) were among the factors he listed.

The All Progressives Congress (APC)’s Senator Ahmed Bola Tinubu was declared the winner of the presidential election, and the INEC Chairman has come under fire for how the polls were handled. Chimamanda Adichie, a well-known writer, is the most prominent Nigerian to say that the EMB disappointed the people.

To be sure, the two fundamental resistance official up-and-comers (Alhaji Atiku Abubakar of Individuals Progressive faction (PDP) and Mr Peter Obi of the Work Party, LP), among others, are at the council to challenge the result of the survey.

How Nigeria spent N207 billion on 68 million Nigerians who didn’t vote

Accreditation ought to have started the polling at 8. 30 a.m., and vote right away; the election should end at 2. 30p.m. be that as it may, in many surveying units across Nigeria, license didn’t begin until early afternoon and now and again the night of February 25, the primary day of political race when Nigerians decided in favor of their next President, legislators and individuals from the Place of Agents.

While those who were prepared to wait were ultimately unable to vote because officials closed without addressing them, many people exited polling units in anger.

Only 25 million of Nigeria’s 93 registered voters cast ballots in the February 25 elections, leaving 68 million people unable to participate.

Additionally, turnout was lower for the governorship and House of Assembly elections held on March 18. Assessed 21 million individuals casted a ballot.

The elections have had the lowest voter turnout since 2011.In nigeria

In Nigeria’s elections, the number of registered voters decreased from 73 million in 2011 to 67 million in 2015, but it increased to 82 million in 2019 and 93 million in 2023.

Poor turnout: in 2011, turnout was 39 million, fell to 29 million in 2015, and remained at 29 million in 2019, before increasing to 25 million for presidential and National Assembly elections and 21 million for governorship and House of Assembly elections in 2023.
Examiners said the unfortunate turnout figure kept in the 2023 surveys couldn’t be accused on lack of care given that Nigerians the nation over, particularly young people, communicated readiness to cast a ballot, a circumstance that obviously prompted the upsurge in electors’ enlistment in the INEC persistent citizens’ enrollment practice which definitely added 11 million citizens to the register utilized for the 2019 races.
Using the N565 to $1 parallel market exchange rate as of April 2022 (ten months ago) when it released its Election Project Plan (EPP) document, Sunday Vanguard found that INEC may have estimated the cost per voter for the 2023 elections at $5.39, with a target of 100 million registered voters.

At that time, a projected budget of N305 billion was in Nigeria

However, the election management body (EMB) registered 93 million voters, seven million fewer than its anticipated 100 million.

Essentially, the budget should have been reduced to N298 billion for the 93 billion registered voters (at N3, 207 per voter) rather than spending N305 billion on 100 million voters.

Another calculation reveals that only 25 million of the 93 million registered voters participated in the February 25 election. This means that N207 billion was set aside for the remaining 68 million voters who were unable to fulfill their civic duty, while an estimated 21 million voters participated in the March 18 election in nigeria

In the mean time reserves were utilized to obtain polling form papers among different things for the surveys in nigeria

For instance, each of the three segments of the February 25 elections—the presidential, Senate, and House of Representatives polls—would have required the printing of 93 million papers.

In the end, only 25 million individuals cast ballots. 68 million were unable in nigeria

21 million people cast ballots on March 18, but only 93 million ballots would have been printed for the governorship portion of the election, which was held in only 28 states. On the other hand, 93 million ballots would have been printed for the House of Assembly portion, which was held in all 36 states.

At the time of publication, it was not possible to determine the actual cost of printing the ballots.
The printing of result sheets would also have been possible.

If more people had exercised their right to vote in the elections of 2023, the country would not have spent more money on other expenses related to the elections, such as salaries for election staff in nigeria

However, expenses were also incurred for equipment like the newly introduced Bimodal Voter Accreditation System (BVAS) machines and vehicles, whose use is not restricted to the polls in 2023 because they can still be used in subsequent polls. As a result, analysts claim that the cost per voter in this year’s elections cannot be determined in nigeria

EPP archive

Sunday Vanguard reviews that INEC had proposed in April 2022 the amount of N305 billion for the lead of the 2023 general races

This was contained in the commission’s EPP record unfurled during the EMB meeting with the media in front of the 2023 general decisions.

The document states that INEC would require N305 billion to conduct the polls.
Each commission department’s budget requirements for the general elections were broken down in the document.

Nigeria Wasted Over N255 Billion due to Low Voter Turnout in the Last 3 General Elections

The EPP document indicates that INEC has 23 departments and directorates.

INEC stated, “The average cost per voter is pegged at $1 to $3 for established and stable democracies.” In temporary majority rules systems, it goes from $4 to $8, while the expense is fixed at $9 or more in post-struggle and a few momentary popular governments.”

The commission stated that elections tend to be more expensive in emerging democratic nations as a result.

Consequently, INEC used the N565 to $1 parallel market exchange rate to estimate the cost per voter for the 2023 election, with a goal of 100 million registered voters, according to its EPP document.
Thus, the genuine figure is N304.54 billion, addressing a 61.37 percent expansion over what was spent to direct the 2019 general decisions.

According to the EPP report, INEC spent N189.2 billion to hold the general elections in 2019, with 84 million registered voters and a cost per voter of $6.24 at a rate of N305.

The real cost per voter for the 2023 election was $5.39, down from $6.24 in 2019, but the exchange rate has risen dramatically since the 2019 general elections.

The proposed budget for the elections in 2023 may also be higher due, among other things, to an increase in the number of registered voters, which is one of the factors used to plan election budgets. Additionally, the establishment of 56,873 brand-new polling units may also be a factor.

Nine items made up 76.68 percent of the proposed election budget for 2023, according to an analysis. The majority of the budget was allocated to the purchase of accreditation devices, accounting for 34.51 percent of the total, while 8.89 percent of the budget was allocated to run-off elections. Honoraria for specially appointed staff, planned operations, and printing of polling form papers covered 7.79 percent, 7.54 percent, and 6.78 percent, individually.

INEC explained that the Federal Government would provide the necessary funds for the commission to cover the fixed and direct costs of the budget for the 2023 elections.

INEC further made sense of that despite the fact that it was not reflected either in the proper financial plan of the commission or in the center expenses for the direct of races, it will likewise get support from advancement accomplices for a portion of its discretionary exercises, for example, preparing, limit building, municipal and citizen training, creation of data, schooling and correspondence materials, and commitment with partners. It stated that each of these aimed to improve inclusive advocacy for women, youth, people with disabilities, and other

“For the 2023 races, INEC has projected 100 million enrolled citizens, proposing N305 billion to lead the political decision. The possibility of a significant expenditure of funds is very troubling in light of the country’s declining voter turnout rate. To forestall one more circumstance of enormous assets going to squander because of lower citizen turnout, the discretionary commission might have to embrace serviceable measures to guarantee more cooperation at the 2023 surveys”, the EPP had said
Casting a ballot materials

The record said that INEC will spend at least N239.2bn on securing casting a ballot materials and vehicles that will be utilized in the 2023 general races.

It also stated that N239.2 billion, or 78.44% of its N305 billion budget, would be spent on ten essential items, such as ballot papers, operational vehicles, ballot boxes, allowances for ad hoc workers, result sheet printing, logistics, and the acquisition of accreditation devices.
Part of the proposition in the N239.2billion spending plan was the N27.1billion saved by the commission for conceivable run-off decisions, including the one for the official survey.
According to a breakdown of the document, 2023 EPP, the acquisition of accreditation devices, which will cost N105.2 billion, will be the most expensive single item. Additionally, this contributed 34.51 percent of the N305 billion election budget.

N23 billion was set aside for election logistics expenses, which included the movement, deployment, and retrieval of people and materials for the elections. The allowance for ad hoc workers, which will include more than one million individuals, was estimated to be N23.7 billion.

INEC was likewise expected to burn through N20.6billion on the printing of voting form papers and N12.7billion on the acquirement of non-delicate materials. The commission put away N9.5billion for the printing of result sheets, N7.8billion for the obtainment of polling stations and a different N5.39billion for a similar reason. Additionally, it was anticipated that the electoral body would spend N3.9 billion on the purchase of operational vehicles.

The Yakubu story

Shielding Yakubu on the blemishes in the surveys, the INEC source, who talked on the state of obscurity since he was not approved to talk on the issue attributable to the delicate idea of the matter, refered to the Director’s journey to utilize innovation to drive tenable surveys which, as per him, propelled the utilization of BVAs and IREV.

He stated, “The INEC boss resorted to the use of technology for the purpose of ensuring credible polls, which was a clear departure from the past when polls were blatantly rigged by politicians altering election results at will.”

Additionally, we witnessed all of the attempts made by politicians and parties to halt the use of technology in the polls. There were even attempts to remove Yakubu based on this, but he stood his ground. Some people even went to court four times.

The Chairman was found not guilty, according to an INEC source, because a post-election investigation revealed that BVAS’s performance at the polls was more than 98% successful.

On the supposed closure of the official entrance of IREV to attack the framework and impact the result, the source said nothing might have been further from reality.

He claims that the prolonged shutdown was necessary in an effort to prevent hacking into the system.
He said that while the portals for other elections, like governorship, senatorial, House of Representatives, and House of Assembly, had been tested to near perfection in off-cycle polls (in Ondo, Ekiti, Osun, Anambra, and Edo), INEC never had a chance to test its effectiveness before the 2023 elections.

He stated, “The server operator was based in the UK.”

The following is a description of the events that inevitably gave the impression that saboteurs intent on manipulating the outcome deliberately shut down the presidential portal: On February 25, the operator of the server was perplexed by the volume of data and other things entering the portal. Thinking that hackers might be at work, they shut down the portal in their panic.

The shutdown prevented the portal from receiving presidential election results uploaded from polling places into the IREV, whereas the Senate and House of Representatives portals were uploading results.
“Be that as it may, there were a neighborhood back up in Abuja which was enacted right away yet it likewise produced a few issues which prompted a circumstance by which one state result went to one more state as displayed on the IREV.

“In the meantime, the problems were fixed when the server administrators in the United Kingdom restarted the presidential election portal.”

On whether the entrance closure might have impacted the uprightness of the official political decision, the source said no.

He went on to say that “the portal has the capacity to store uploaded documents and alter send to IREV without any form of tampering.”

He asserts that those praising Yakubu ought to be aware that it would have been difficult for those who now have access to BVAS, which stores all of the information they can use to challenge the declaration of winners in the elections at the tribunal, were it not for the technology he introduced into the elections.

The source stated that some of the RECs’ actions had a negative impact on poll results and were clearly partisan. They also stated that it was unfair to blame the EMB Chairman for such activities because they were outside of his control.

He noted, “For example, about 19 RECs were appointed close to the polls, and as it turned out, many of them were clearly partisan.” Additionally, he said, “some were deployed to states where they had sympathy for the ruling parties,” and he said that many of them were appointed close to the polls.
“Should we also put the blame on INEC or the Chairman?”

According to the source, only INEC, out of all of the government agencies that participated in the election, has taken disciplinary action against employees who have been acting improperly, to the point of recommending to President Muhammadu Buhari the dismissal of two RECs who had been found to be acting improperly during the polls.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *