A man from Texas is suing three women for helping his now-ex-wife get abortion pills last year.
“A person who assists a pregnant woman in obtaining a self-managed abortion has committed the crime of murder,” the lawsuit asserts.
Text messages between Marcus Silva’s ex-wife and the three women are a significant part of the lawsuit.
Since constitutional abortion protections were struck down by the Supreme Court, this is the state’s first such lawsuit.
Mr. Silva is suing for $1 million, or £800,000. It is alleged that his ex-wife’s friends sent her information about Aid Access, a global organization that mails pills.
According to text messages, Mr. Silva’s ex-wife was worried that if she found out he was pregnant, he would try to convince her to stay with him.
According to the lawsuit, one of the women gave the pills to Mr. Silva’s ex-wife.
The lawsuit claims that once they are identified, the drug manufacturer will also be named as a defendant.
The lawsuit claims that the women instructed Mr. Silva’s ex-wife to conceal the pregnancy and their baby-related text messages from him, leading to a conspiracy charge against them.
Due to the fact that pregnant women are exempt from prosecution under Texas law, Mr. Silva’s former wife is not named as a defendant.
The lawsuit states that they share two daughters.
Before the divorce was finalized in February 2023, she filed for divorce in May 2022. The claim charges she learned she was pregnant in July 2022, after the High Court toppled Roe v Swim, however a month prior to the state’s trigger regulation forbidding early termination became effective, which made giving a fetus removal a crime deserving of up to life in jail but to save the existence of the mother.
Numerous other restrictions on abortion existed in the state prior to the trigger ban’s implementation.
Texas enacted a law in 2021 that outlawed most abortions after about six weeks of pregnancy. “Knowingly engages in conduct that aids or abets the performance or inducement of an abortion,” it gave citizens the right to sue. When Roe v. Wade was overturned,
Briscoe Cain, a Republican state representative, and Jonathan Mitchell, a former solicitor general who contributed to the creation of one of Texas’ abortion bans, are Mr. Silva’s representatives.
A request for clarification from the defendants was not immediately responded to.
Five women filed a lawsuit against the state of Texas last week over restricted abortion access when their health posed life-threatening risks. In their lawsuit, they claim that doctors are afraid of being prosecuted and are only performing the procedure in extreme cases.
Another lawsuit aimed at the Food and Drug Administration’s approval process for the abortion pill mifepristone is also expected to be decided soon by a Texas judge. Mifepristone’s availability across the nation could be impacted if the judge rules that the FDA’s approval was invalid.
what is abortion? and why man sues
is a controversial and highly debated topic, typically referring to the termination of a pregnancy. The methods and legality of abortion vary widely across different countries and regions, with some places allowing it under certain circumstances, while others prohibit it entirely.
Proponents of abortion argue that it is necessary for women to have control over their own bodies and reproductive choices, while opponents believe that it is morally wrong and that life begins at conception. The debate over abortion also involves discussions around the rights of the fetus, the potential physical and emotional consequences for the woman, and the societal implications of allowing or prohibiting the practice.
It’s worth noting that conversations around abortion can be highly emotional and sensitive, and it’s important to approach the topic with empathy and respect for differing viewpoints.